« September 06, 2003 | Main | September 09, 2003 »
September 08, 2003
Web Based Enterprise Management
The Distributed Management Task Force is working to create desktop, enterprise and Internet management standards. Not surprisingly, their website gives a long list of members. Their Web site lists the following standards:
Common Information Model (CIM)
This is a common data model of an implementation-neutral schema for describing overall management information in a network/enterprise environment.
Desktop Management Interface (DMI)
These standards generate a standard framework for managing and tracking components in a desktop PC, notebook or server.
Directory Enabled Network Initiative (DEN)
The Directory Enabled Network (DEN) initiative is designed to provide building blocks for intelligent management by mapping concepts from CIM (such as systems, services and policies) to a directory, and integrating this information with other WBEM elements in the management infrastructure.
Web-Based Enterprise Management (WBEM)
This initiative is a set of management and Internet standard technologies developed to unify the management of enterprise computing environments.
Alert Standard Format (ASF)
This specification defines remote control and alerting interfaces that best serve clients' OS-absent environments.
System Management BIOS (SMBIOS)
The SMBIOS Specification addresses how motherboard and system vendors present management information about their products in a standard format by extending the BIOS interface on Intel architecture systems.
I was interested in WBEM. WBEM uses CIM as a common format for collecting and describing management data. Another component, called xmlCIM encodes the CIM data for transport as XML and then a mapping describes how to use HTTP for transport. CIM is a fairly general language for describing management objects. I found a great little tutorial on all this that made it easier to get a handle on the effort.
01:30 PM | Recommend This | Print This
Is This the End of Linux?
Connect Magazine, a regional business magazine where I have a monthly column has a feature story this month called Is This the End of Linux? The article is not an apology for SCO and not a SCO-bash either. Overall, I think it does a good job of presenting SCOs arguments while raising some some fair questions about how SCO operates. There's a good discussion of Canopy, the investment firm behind SCO. Ralph Yarrow, the head of Canopy, is quoted in the article:
"Dig into Canopy and you'll see we make much more money than we have in lawsuits. I'm in the business of growing tech companies, and if I need to litigate to protect them, I'll do that." Even if it means a rash of bad press, like the SCO case. "I've never worried about public image. I don't manage other people's money, we're self-perpetuating. Image has little impact, if any."
I don't buy this. One of the great tragedies of this whole thing is the damage that's being done to other Canopy companies---good companies that are unrelated to SCO but are feeling the weight of the bad press. I've talked to a number of friends who work for Canopy companies and they all feel it to one degree or another.