« Using CCTVs to Make Movies | Main | Starting a High Tech Business: Legal and Banking »
State Sovereignty Doesn't Count for Much Online
Let me pose a hypothetical situation for you: Imagine some backwater town in your state. Now, imagine that some vandals move through town one night and plaster the local water board office with pornographic posters. The town fails to clean it up for a few weeks. Now, imagine that in response, the federal government mobilizes the Army and shuts down every government office in the state.
Never happen, right? Well, in a matter of speaking that’s just what happened to California earlier this week. The story about GSA pulling down CA.gov makes me shake my head in amazement.
Some history: the .gov TLD is managed by the GSA on behalf of the US Federal government. It’s only been 5 or 6 years that the feds have allowed states to use domains in the .gov TLD. In fact, there was some consternation over the whole thing. So, as the registrar, GSA can technically delist any domain in .gov. The question is, can they do so legally?
This quote from the InfoWorld story gets it all wrong:
State IT staffers were able to fix the problem within a few hours, narrowly averting disaster, but the situation shed light on what observers are calling a shocking weakness in the state’s IT infrastructure.From Feds pull the domain name plug on State of California | InfoWorld | News | 2007-10-04 | By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service
Referenced Fri Oct 05 2007 11:19:51 GMT-0600 (MDT)
Now, indeed, it’s probably true that parts of California’s IT infrastructure are less than secure. That’s what happens when you have hundreds of agencies all going their own way and an assembly that’s unwilling to put them under the jurisdiction of a strong CIO. But that’s not the story here.
The story is this: US states are sovereign. That is, within the federal structure, they operate independently and are self-governing. States are granted significant rights by the Constitution. Heck, they have the right to raise armies! Because of the Constitution they exist independent of the power of Congress. Contrast this to the way most cities and town operate: they are wholly creatures of the state legislature and 100% subject to it’s whims.
So, to my mind, the fact that some faceless bureaucrat in DC is making the decision, with no legal basis other than the technical power to control the switch, to shut down California’s online presence is shocking. Besides the point that the response was wholly out of proportion to the problem, any action whatsoever on the part of the Feds beyond a friendly “head’s-up; you’ve got a problem” phone call was beyond their authority.
Posted by windley on October 5, 2007 11:29 AM



Comment from Jordy at October 5, 2007 1:07 PM
I couldn't agree more. Thanks for standing up for state rights.
Comment from Frank Sapp at October 5, 2007 1:41 PM
That issue was settled in 1865. Although slavery is touted as the reason for the war of secession, the major factor was states rights.
If CA is using the .gov domain, then the feds have every right to drop them for any reason they want to use at any time.
Transportation monies from the feds are used frequently to force states into changing state laws to meet a federal mandate. Prime examples are changing the legal drinking age to 21 and changing the speed limits to an arbitrary 55 and requiring enforcement.
If CA wanted full control, they'd use their own domain type name - http://www.dol.state.ga.us/ for instance.
Beware of feds bearing gifts (or grants)
Comment from rand at October 7, 2007 2:23 PM
Phil,
The problem is that you actually believe that the Constitution means what it says. The 10th amendment has been rendered a truism. The Federal Government routinely usurps rights were originally reserved to the states. Many Supreme Court justices are too busy looking for rights which are not innumerated in the Constitution to pay attention to the ones that are actually there.
Remember, the bill of rights was specifically added to the Constitution to protect the states and the people from a strong federal government. Unfortunately, not enough people care. They would rather have Washington take care of them than exert the effort to take care of themselves. It is the age old exchange of freedom for security that Benjamin Franklin warned us about.
Leave a comment
I encourage you to leave a comment below. Your email address will not be displayed on Technometria, but allows me to communicate with you directly. Your email address won't be displayed, but will be used to compute a MicroID for your comment.