« Identity Open Space in Europe | Main | Monkey Pornography, Social Status, and Reputation »

Relative Celebrity and Reputation

Britt’s working on a concept he calls Relative Celebrity. The idea is that in the world of the long tail, there is some ranking and “every member of a network must be related to someone who is closer to the action - relatively speaking, a celebrity - and also act as a valued conduit of news, gossip and conjecture for others, acting as that person’s relative celebrity.”

It’s an intriguing idea and one that makes me think about reputation and it’s value in a global Internet sense. To date, online reputation systems have been localized to a particular Web site because of a very real limitation: our identities are localized to those same stovepipes Web sites.

The emergence of user-centric, wide-area identity systems like OpenID and CardSpace provide the infrastructure necessary to enable wide-area reputation as well.

Britt uses the word “status” in his post, but while it can be construed as that, I think it’s much deeper. The word “status” implies something that’s good for the person who has it, but conveys little social good. On the other hand, reputation is widely seen by economists, sociologists, and psychologists as something with real social value.

To have social value, reputation has to be the basis of trust in the society and there has to be reciprocity. Reputation is a measure of an entity’s past actions and factual attributes. Trust is an expectation of future behavior. Reciprocity is the idea that “good” actions will be met by society with positive results and “bad” actions with negative results.

I think Britt’s on the right track with what he’s proposing. To really function, social systems have to have reputation, trust, and reciprocity baked in. Without it, there’s no real social contract and no real society.

Posted by windley on March 5, 2007 5:59 PM

See related posts:

5 Comments

Comment from William at March 6, 2007 10:27 AM

On an algorithmic level this concept seems similar to the concept of supernodes - except that relative celebrities have specialization and have bandwidth requirements that fall along a gradient scale. Thanks to the degrees of separation principle and the multivariate hierarchies you can create by weaving together the RSS feeds of your "relative celebrities" the information feed you have coming in can create a unique signature that matches the desire of your personality and gives you a more optimal signal-noise ratio.

I think this is the paradigm shift the news media hasn't really grasped yet. They are trying to put up their own blogs and compete head to head with the bloggers. A for effort. F for results. What they really need to do to be innovative is open up the database of information their reporters are collecting in the field to their consumers and leverage the long tail for analysis and commentary. Bloggers for example could create mashups based on high quality journalism coming from the various sources. It doesn't have to be a "blogger" vs. "journalist" type of thing. Basically separate out and standardize the system for collecting high quality facts-based field journalism from the analysis that is being performed. In other words everyone uses the same set of facts, let the long tail analyze what those facts are.

There is a double edged sword of sorts here in my opinion. On one hand it's getting easier than ever to use the internet to find valuable information that was suppressed because it didn't fit the one-size-fits-all pattern of old media. But on the other hand it's easier than ever to decide that all you want to drink is your flavor of kool-aid, and that kind of ignorance is only ever bliss in the short term. If we can strike the right type of balance it is going to be overwhelmingly positive for society.

And yes to keep you happy, working identity systems will be key to all of this.

thanks for this good posting

regards

Comment from sohbet at May 22, 2007 7:55 PM

thank you webmaster for a good blog and goog post. i am reading all

Comment from sohbet at July 16, 2007 5:34 AM

thanks for this good posting

regards

Comment from Canli at September 21, 2007 5:36 AM

this posting became good but does not seem to be current any longer.

Leave a comment

I encourage you to leave a comment below. Your email address will not be displayed on Technometria, but allows me to communicate with you directly. Your email address won't be displayed, but will be used to compute a MicroID for your comment.